Current:Home > NewsAppeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies -FutureFinance
Appeals court halts order barring Biden administration communications with social media companies
Fastexy View
Date:2025-04-10 19:43:03
Washington — A federal appeals court on Friday temporarily paused a lower court order that limited communications between top Biden administration officials and social media companies about content posted to their platforms.
The three-judge panel for the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals granted the Justice Department's request to put on hold the July 4 preliminary injunction from U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty while legal proceedings continue. It also agreed to expedite the administration's appeal.
The temporary administrative stay will remain in place "until further orders of the court," according to the brief order.
The Justice Department turned to the 5th Circuit for relief after it asked Doughy last week to halt his own order while it pursued an appeal. Doughty, appointed by former President Donald Trump, declined to do so, and in a 13-page ruling rejected the government's assertions that his injunction swept too broadly and threatened to chill lawful conduct.
"Although this Preliminary Injunction involves numerous agencies, it is not as broad as it appears," Doughty wrote. "It only prohibits something the Defendants have no legal right to do — contacting social media companies for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner, the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted on social-media platforms."
The judge reiterated that he believes Missouri and Louisiana, who sued the government last year over federal officials' communications with social media companies during the COVID-19 pandemic and 2020 election cycle, are likely to succeed on the merits of their case.
The states "are likely to prove that all of the enjoined defendants coerced, significantly encouraged, and/or jointly participated [with] social-media companies to suppress social-media posts by American citizens that expressed opinions that were anti-COVID-19 vaccines, anti-COVID-19 lockdowns, posts that delegitimized or questioned the results of the 2020 election, and other content not subject to any exception to the First Amendment," he wrote. "These items are protected free speech and were seemingly censored because of the viewpoints they expressed."
The judge's July 4 injunction blocks top Biden administration officials from communicating with social-media companies "for the purpose of urging, encouraging, pressuring, or inducing in any manner the removal, deletion, suppression, or reduction of content containing protected free speech posted" on their platforms.
Among those covered by the injunction are Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra, Surgeon General Vivek Murthy and White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, as well as several federal agencies.
The order contains several carve-outs, including allowing the Biden administration to inform social media companies of posts involving criminal activity, threats to national security and public safety, and illegal efforts to suppress voting or of foreign attempts to influence elections.
In its request that the injunction be halted, the Justice Department warned that it swept too broadly and is unclear as to what conduct is allowed and who is covered.
The injunction, administration lawyers said, "may be read to prevent the Government from engaging in a vast range of lawful and responsible conduct — including speaking on matters of public concern and working with social media companies on initiatives to prevent grave harm to the American people and our democratic processes."
The lawsuit brought by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, as well as several individuals, alleges that senior government officials colluded with social-media companies to suppress viewpoints and content on social media platforms, violating the First Amendment.
Their suit accused platforms like Twitter and Facebook of censoring a New York Post story about the contents of a laptop owned by Hunter Biden, Mr. Biden's son, posts about the origins of COVID-19 and various mitigation measures implemented during the pandemic and speech about the integrity of the 2020 presidential election.
- In:
- Biden Administration
- Social Media
veryGood! (9215)
Related
- New data highlights 'achievement gap' for students in the US
- Making a $1B investment in the US? Trump pledges expedited permits — but there are hurdles
- Woman fired from Little India massage parlour arrested for smashing store's glass door
- KISS OF LIFE reflects on sold
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- Highlights from Trump’s interview with Time magazine
- Only about 2 in 10 Americans approve of Biden’s pardon of his son Hunter, an AP
- Horoscopes Today, December 11, 2024
- SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
- 'Yellowstone' Season 5, Part 2: Here's when the final episode comes out and how to watch
Ranking
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Trump names Andrew Ferguson as head of Federal Trade Commission to replace Lina Khan
- Pakistan ex
- Man who jumped a desk to attack a Nevada judge in the courtroom is sentenced
- NFL Week 15 picks straight up and against spread: Bills, Lions put No. 1 seed hopes on line
- Arizona city sues federal government over PFAS contamination at Air Force base
- PACCAR recalls over 220,000 trucks for safety system issue: See affected models
- Mitt Romney’s Senate exit may create a vacuum of vocal, conservative Trump critics
Recommendation
Newly elected West Virginia lawmaker arrested and accused of making terroristic threats
Donald Trump is returning to the world stage. So is his trolling
Gas prices set to hit the lowest they've been since 2021, AAA says
When does the new season of 'Virgin River' come out? Release date, cast, where to watch
'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
In a First, Arizona’s Attorney General Sues an Industrial Farm Over Its Water Use
Who are the most valuable sports franchises? Forbes releases new list of top 50 teams
Chiquis comes from Latin pop royalty. How the regional Mexican star found her own crown